Monday, January 30, 2012

Gentle(wo)men, start your tin-foil hats....

Following are 3 links to articles addressing the recent Georgia court case re: Obama's eligibility to run for President in the state of Georgia. If you haven't heard about it, don't be surprised. There was -0- "mainstream" news coverage, despite Network reporters in the courtroom.

Having interviewed most of the parties to the "conspiracy" (Jerome Corsi, Orly Taitz, et al) from the beginning 4-5 years ago, it has amazed me more that the "mainstream media" has been so obviously dismissive of this story. Not that it's surprising a liberal agenda motivated media would not cover for their darlings; that's a given. Only the uninformed and terminally naive (or just plain "liberal")  would not understand such has been SOP in America for a long, long, loooog time.

No, for me the fascination has been how starkly obvious, blatantly open, monumentally condescending and deliberately dismissive the "mainstream media" has been in any/all of the factors within this story. That anyone bringing up the subject in polite conversation is almost immediately derided as a "birther", "conspiracy theorist" and - most recently - "racist".

The unassailable logic stands center stage, unchallenged but sans a spotlight; maybe a 200 pound gorilla is more analogous. If Obama's qualifications are so simple to provide, why haven't they? It's a fact: Obama has spent millions in legal fees fighting to keep this out of the courts. Now - as you will read below - it's in there. And the Rule of Law in now on trial, not the apathy of the press or the ignorance of the voter. The cornerstone of the Republic - the Rule of Law - has been trespassed. What happens now will determine the future of the Republic - "if you can keep it". (Ben Franklin)

The National Patriot

Canada Free Press

American Thinker

The Future

The Future (if you're over 40)

Interviewed this guy. Helluva story!

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

"Being There" is the greatest political satire ever.

Once again the GOP proves it really is the stoopid party, unable to mount a reasonable challenge against an incumbent not competent to sit on a trash committee for an HOA, the lowest for of fascism known to mankind.

Obama will win going away.  There is simply no meaningful opposition.  That will probably allow him to place three more "living-constitution"-alists on the Supreme Court -- say goodbye to anything resembling a nation of laws with the Chicago thugocracy and the downhill spiral of the nation will go completely out of control as The One's transformation of us into Cuba becomes unstoppable.

Victor Davis Hanson is one of the brightest analystical minds writing sobering, insightful pieces anywhere. I am fortunate to have him as an occasional guest on the show. Before he's on again in a few weeks, read this scathing and MOA accurate look at America's political future this year. WARNING: you're not gonna like it but you won't be able to deny it.

Say there, Skippy...

Do you have a tin-foil hat? Two (one for "dress")? Are you down with all that Black Helecopter, FEMA Death Camps, Black Ops stuff?
Do you worship at the Alter of Jones every evening? Are you tired of not being invited to all the parties your otherwise well-adjusted friends toss for their "Sheeple-Lemmng" buds?

Wellllllll.....lift your head up high and take a walk in the surf with that majesty and fortitude that you'll show the world! You'll show them where to get off! That you were right all alongThey were the real Jersey Kool-Aide Drinkers, not you! They were the ones with the anal-cranial inversion, not you! It' Revenge of the Nerds, Part XLMVIII!

But seriously....while I haven't read the book, here is a review of Gary North's "Conspiracy: A Biblical View". While we have never met, Gary is a fellow traveler in the Lew Rockwell Traveling Salvation Show ( and tends to contribute interesting if not compelling pieces. And while I have also never met Gary Kinghorn, his critique below has earned him an invitation to be on the show ASAP.
Stay tuned for that while you read:

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

So: you agree with Ron Paul ...

So: you agree with Ron Paul on many things except his wacky non-interventionist (not "isolantionist") "foreign policy", right?

That has to mean to l-o--o-o-v-e RomneySantoumGingrichPerry because their "foreign policy" means bombing the shiite out of IranSyriaYemenLibya or anywhere else some potentate (of a soverign country) dares wag its finger at Mighty Uncle Sam, right?

Suggestion: Read this short piece by my friend, Fred. Then send it to RomneySantoumGingrichPerry. Then tell me again how "wacky" Ron Paul's  foreign policy is.

I'll wait here...

Monday, January 9, 2012

L. Neil Smith on Freedom and Liberty

L. Neil Smith, an award-winning writer of insufficient reknown, who writes regularly for The Libertarian Enterprise, a fine publication in need of severe promotion.
Here is his latest and a fine introduction to the mind mind of an individual dedicated to Freedom and Liberty.

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Why Ron Paul Matters

This is a WSJ piece is written by Ed Crane, c-founder/President of the Cato Institute. While we as yet don't have reciprocating Wills, I've known Ed since 1994 when Cato was just a baby DC think tank. Ed, David Boaz, Cato "graduate" Stephen Moore are among the few people who can accurately and objectively assess the current landscape. If you have been sucked in or confused by the MSM, FOX "News" and certain talk show hosts (Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, Levin, et al) regarding Ron Paul, the primaries, economics, "electability", etc., this is a great piece to read.

Hell, it's a great piece regardless!

An excellent lesson in ...

Semantics and reality!